Design Evanston praises 910-938 Custer Ave. project

0
Design Evanston praises 910-938 Custer Ave. project

On Oct. 7, Design Evanston professional members met to evaluate the proposed 910-938 Custer Ave. project, as presented by Max Charles Davidson of CDG Capital, Paul Dincin of Catapult Real Estate Solutions and Andy Ahitow of CityPads.

The meeting was at Tapestry Station, 740 Main St. Following is a summary of comments reflecting Design Evanston’s project review standards (criteria listed in bold type below):

General comments

Overall, the general consensus of the reviewing group was that the proposed project is a very appropriate and attractive transit-oriented development for this particular location in Evanston. It is of an appropriate height and massing for its context. It will provide desirable housing, a portion of it on-site affordable units, in an area that is proving to be an appropriate area for such development, “west of the tracks.” The project has minimal impact on its neighboring properties, which include the backside of vintage retail structures to the south, the existing single-family residential structures to the west and the Metra railroad embankment to the east. It improves and widens existing alley configurations. Parking provided is in keeping with recent developments in this area, market trends and municipal policies. The project provides significant benefits to the city with minimal burdens on its existing infrastructure. The specific execution of the facade treatment of the project appears headed in the right direction.

Criteria comments

1. The project should address a perceived need in the city and its respective community.

Yes. There is a perceived market for increased residential development in this area of the city, particularly for younger single individuals and couples without children. The increased population in the area will provide beneficial support to local retail establishments.

2. The project should be of an appropriate and beneficial use within the project’s geographical context.

Yes. See above. The Chicago/Main transit node is an appropriate location for such a development.

3. The project should be of appropriate and complementary size, scale and proportion for its physical context.

link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *